|
Post by spideyfan914 on Oct 3, 2010 12:23:51 GMT -6
Zane, your like 14...the only sexual relationship you have is probably with your right hand. Bitch, annoying Zane is my thing. But Nick does it so much BETTER!
|
|
|
Post by zane on Oct 3, 2010 16:20:11 GMT -6
I concur.
|
|
jukenami
New Member
I Can Be Anything
Posts: 18
|
Post by jukenami on Oct 3, 2010 16:30:11 GMT -6
but sexual relationships seem so meaningless...
And Spidey, that chemical reaction in your brain thing makes sense... in a way. Still doesnt really explain gay people, unless they have a certain chemical reaction that is different?
|
|
|
Post by Nickpick on Oct 3, 2010 16:37:11 GMT -6
I'm just messing with you Zane.
|
|
|
Post by zane on Oct 3, 2010 16:44:25 GMT -6
Alright.
And they're not all meaningless. Well not mine anyway. My guess is because the sex thing is only a part of it.
And I AM Ambidextrous.
|
|
jukenami
New Member
I Can Be Anything
Posts: 18
|
Post by jukenami on Oct 3, 2010 16:55:35 GMT -6
I am right handed.
|
|
|
Post by spideyfan914 on Oct 4, 2010 11:24:31 GMT -6
unless they have a certain chemical reaction that is different? This, yes. Not saying there ISN'T love, just that it can be defined in terms of brain chemistry.
|
|
|
Post by Kranstin Kardashian on Oct 4, 2010 19:19:39 GMT -6
unless they have a certain chemical reaction that is different? This, yes. Not saying there ISN'T love, just that it can be defined in terms of brain chemistry. ...We're still going to burn you.
|
|
jukenami
New Member
I Can Be Anything
Posts: 18
|
Post by jukenami on Oct 4, 2010 20:06:08 GMT -6
unless they have a certain chemical reaction that is different? This, yes. Not saying there ISN'T love, just that it can be defined in terms of brain chemistry. yeah... interesting... But I think that has to deal with the initial attraction. I dont think those chemical reactions can keep two people in a relationship for 50 years. It really takes love for that to work out. So, yeah, it probably takes a chemical reaction for two people to be instantly attracted to each other, that initial attraction CAN lead to love. But love is something science can't really ever explain.
|
|
|
Post by Kranstin Kardashian on Oct 4, 2010 20:22:37 GMT -6
But love is something science can't really ever explain. Just you wait and see.
|
|
|
Post by Kranstin Kardashian on Oct 4, 2010 20:23:44 GMT -6
But love is something science can't really ever explain. Just you wait and see. BURN HIM!
|
|
|
Post by spideyfan914 on Oct 5, 2010 9:53:39 GMT -6
Um, I mean, just because science can explain doesn't mean it's any less real.... I USED to not believe in love, but we all know how that's changed. (Though I still don't believe in love at first sight - that's ridiculous.) Love is an extreme emotion, and all emotions DO stem from biology in some way, shape, or form. And I'm not equating love with lust either - lust is fake love, though it is FAR more common than actual love.
|
|
|
Post by Kranstin Kardashian on Oct 5, 2010 23:31:57 GMT -6
Burn him but with less enthusiasm.
|
|
|
Post by zane on Oct 6, 2010 16:54:08 GMT -6
I would like to point out that the chemical reactions work slightly different in men then in women. Men will have the reaction for almost any woman if the timing is right and the testosterone level is high. In fact, 60 percent of divorces are from relationships initially started by these timing failures.
|
|
|
Post by spideyfan914 on Oct 6, 2010 20:22:13 GMT -6
.... only 60%....?
|
|
|
Post by zane on Oct 11, 2010 15:10:41 GMT -6
*deletes Spideyfan's post* Shit just got real son.
|
|
|
Post by spideyfan914 on Oct 11, 2010 15:42:26 GMT -6
.... I posted....?
|
|
|
Post by Kranstin Kardashian on Oct 11, 2010 23:35:47 GMT -6
I'm noticing a distinct lack of burning around here.
...I really shouldn't have said that, right?
|
|
|
Post by zane on Oct 12, 2010 5:26:53 GMT -6
eh alright. *sets you ablaze*
|
|
|
Post by Kranstin Kardashian on Oct 12, 2010 10:08:25 GMT -6
Oh, how kind-of-ironic-but-not-really!
Given that this is Blake's thread, you can expect "flaming" jokes.
|
|